tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13944783.post111973566738426923..comments2007-04-14T10:26:31.752-07:00bboinquiryhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14255826266014717170noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13944783.post-1119967172086576052005-06-28T06:59:00.000-07:002005-06-28T06:59:00.000-07:00I have participated in a discussion of this on BBF. I am sure you have read it by now. But I have become more and more disatisfied with mulderberg with respect to my current bidding practices. This despite Mulderberg was one of my favorite conventions. <BR/><BR/>I consider this 2H/2S opening bid as being minimum opener, with 5M and 4CLUBS as a modified mulderberg. It keeps a lot of the advantages. I will post on my bboinquiry blog some of my thinking about this issue.bboinquiryhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03157979136216412961noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13944783.post-1119752271132376172005-06-25T19:17:00.000-07:002005-06-25T19:17:00.000-07:00Interesting, I never heard about these before. I like to play Gazilli, where 1M-1NT-2C is forcing, and either natural or strong.<BR/><BR/>The consequence is that you cannot play 2C with minimal 5-4 hands, but in your structure, you can't do this either.<BR/><BR/>When putting the advantages (more clarity with both handtypes) against the disadvantages (losing out on some kind of preempts), I don't know what is better.<BR/><BR/>HanAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com